AFCA Leverages Enhanced Standards to Minimize Advice Complaints
AFCA Leverages Enhanced Standards to Minimize Advice Complaints
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) demonstrated significant progress in managing investment and financial advice issues in the past year.
The organization reported closing 4,118 complaints in the sector during the 2024 fiscal year, marking an impressive 82% increase in resolved cases compared to the previous year.
Interestingly, the number of new complaints AFCA received in this sector fell to 3,559, a notable decrease of 26% from the preceding year. According to its annual report, AFCA attributed this decline to the positive impact of rising educational standards and heightened professionalism within the financial advisory industry.
However, challenges persist, particularly concerning the controversial case of Dixon Advisory, which continues to contribute to overall complaints. Without the Dixon Advisory-related grievances, complaints hit an all-time low of 2,709.
Lead Ombudsman for investments and advice, Shail Singh, noted during AFCA's recent member forum that outcomes were not universally favoring complainants. For instance, one claimant involved with Dixon did not suffer harm despite following conflicted advice.
Moreover, Senior Ombudsman Patrick Hartney highlighted, “When compared to what AFCA deemed appropriate advice, the complainant was actually better off with the conflicted advice result.†Hartney explained how cookie-cutter approaches to advice might have variable impacts based on individual circumstances, proving beneficial to some despite being generally suboptimal.
The AFCA annual report further elaborated that nearly half (44%) of the complaints they handled were resolved during the "rules review" phase. This stage, where issues are examined for jurisdictional appropriateness, requires detailed decision-making, explaining the average resolution timeframe of 129 days. Such intricate processes have been partly responsible for protracted case durations.
While complaint volume has decreased, the top issue remains inappropriate advice, which accounted for 706 (20%) of all complaints. Other recurring issues include confusion over the classification of Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) and wholesale client status, often leading to misapplication of financial thresholds, an insight noted by Sidoti, the Senior Ombudsman.
“It’s pretty clear that actually doesn’t apply in circumstances where advice is given to a trustee to an SMSF,†confirmed Sidoti. Misapplication of these financial thresholds can categorize SMSFs inaccurately, with serious advisories issued for small balance SMSFs lacking diversification.
With market volatility influenced by national political events, the authority has observed complaint trends shifting accordingly. Beyond handling regular disputes, AFCA has now been endorsed by the government to lead an external resolution scheme under the Scams Prevention Framework, a major initiative in the governmental “war on scamsâ€, as stated by Minister Stephen Jones.
The pilot will cover three key sectors: banks, telecommunications, and digital platforms, illustrating an expansive approach to scam management involving interconnected industries.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
ASIC’s latest review of mortgage broker conduct has put a spotlight on how loan recommendations are explained, documented and challenged when a cheaper option is available. Although the review focused on home loan brokers, the practical lesson is broader: borrowers should understand not only the advertised rate, but also why a particular loan structure, lender or feature is being presented as suitable. - read more
Australia’s electric truck conversation has shifted from vehicle availability alone to the practical question of where, when and how commercial vehicles will charge. Ampol’s October 2026 activity has made that shift clearer, with the company announcing a proposed acquisition of Evie Networks and a separate memorandum of understanding with Foton Mobility Distribution to explore charging solutions for electric commercial vehicles. - read more
ASIC’s 13 October 2026 review of major mortgage broker groups has delivered a timely reminder for borrowers: a loan recommendation should be understandable, evidence-based and clearly connected to the customer’s needs. The regulator found that broker practices generally aligned with its guidance, but also identified gaps in how some higher-cost loan recommendations, supervision processes and complaints were handled. - read more
Australia’s motorcycle market is ahead of last year after the first nine months of 2026, but the latest FCAI-audited figures point to a recovery driven mainly by off-road demand rather than a uniform lift across every type of bike. For riders thinking about motorbike finance, that distinction matters because the practical costs attached to a trail bike, junior motorcycle, scooter or road machine can look very different once purchase price, transport, gear, insurance and maintenance are considered together. - read more
Australia’s new card surcharge rules have turned a small checkout fee into a wider cash flow question for consumers and small businesses. Since 1 October 2026, businesses have generally been unable to add card payment surcharges for major card networks, making payments look simpler at the counter but leaving operators to decide how remaining merchant costs fit into their pricing, margins and budgeting. - read more
Choosing the right commercial vehicle loan is a pivotal decision for any business aspiring to expand its transportation capabilities. For many, commercial vehicles are integral to daily operations, and securing the best financial arrangement to acquire these assets can significantly impact the bottom line. - read more
Securing finance for any significant purchase can be a challenge, especially when it comes to acquiring a truck for business purposes. Coupled with a less-than-perfect credit score, this task can seem daunting for many Australians. The ripple effects of financial constraints can impede business operations, affecting the lifeline of commercial ventures that rely on transportation. - read more
As a trucking business owner in Australia, finding the right insurance is crucial to the protection of your business. To achieve this, it is important to first understand your specific business needs. Here are some factors to consider: - read more
Buying a used truck can be a practical way to expand or start a transport operation, but finance-related checks are essential before you commit. This guide explains PPSR searches, outstanding finance, private sale documents, lender valuation requirements, insurance and settlement steps for Australian buyers. - read more
When purchasing a truck, whether for personal use or business, navigating the financial landscape can be daunting. This is where pre-approval comes into play. But what exactly does pre-approval mean in the context of buying a truck? - read more
Knowledgebase
Interest Rate Lock: An agreement between a borrower and a lender that allows the borrower to lock in the interest rate on a mortgage for a specified time period.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.